Multidisciplinary Journal: Investigative Perspectives
Multidisciplinary Journal Investigative Perspectives
Vol. 6(3), 1–11, 2026
Strengthening Intercultural Communication Skills Through Telecollaboration Between Colombian and American University
Students
Strengthening Intercultural Communication Skills Through Telecollaboration Between Colombian and American University
Students
Alan Martínez-Murillo
9
understanding of the practices, values, and forms of social organization present in their
interlocutors’ culture, while developing a greater ability to interpret behaviors within their
sociocultural context, thereby avoiding explanations based on stereotypes. From this
perspective, as Byram (1997) argues, intercultural competence does not depend solely on the
acquisition of knowledge, but also on the ability to critically interpret and relate cultural
phenomena. Since the results obtained support this approach, the learning journals show that
participants began to explain cultural differences by considering historical, educational, social,
and institutional factors. To illustrate this, one of the students stated: “It’s not that Americans are
direct by nature; that pattern emerges from educational and business structures that reward
precision and efficiency.” In other words, this type of reflection demonstrates a shift from
simplified interpretations toward more complex analyses of intercultural reality.
Changes in Attitudes and Intercultural Awareness
In contrast, the greatest variations were observed in the dimensions of intercultural attitudes
(3.4 versus 4.5) and critical intercultural awareness (2.6 versus 4.0); thus, these results suggest
that the telecollaboration experience not only broadened the students’ knowledge but also
encouraged them to reexamine their own beliefs, prejudices, and ways of understanding cultural
reality. Given that Byram (1997) and Guilherme (2002) argue that critical intercultural
awareness involves the ability to reflectively examine both one’s own culture and that of others,
the testimonies collected demonstrate this process of reconstructing perspectives. As one
American student describes it: “Talking with my Colombian classmates, I realized how much the
American news system simplifies complex conflicts into ‘good versus bad’ narratives. I hadn’t
recognized this before because that was simply the reality I knew.” That is, the reflection cited
above demonstrates a questioning of previously assumed interpretive frameworks and aligns
with what Mezirow (2000) describes regarding transformative learning, where meaningful
experiences lead to a critical review of previously accepted assumptions.
Empathy as the Cornerstone of Intercultural Learning
In other words, another relevant aspect concerns the role of intercultural empathy during the
learning process; for this reason, the analysis of the diaries revealed that this category was the
most frequent, with 189 entries out of a total of 948 identified codes—a figure representing
approximately 20% of the total. From the perspective of intercultural psychology, Bennett (2004)
notes that understanding other cultures requires developing the ability to recognize different
perspectives without losing one’s own cultural identity. Complementarily, Levinas (1969) argues
that the encounter with the other constitutes an ethical experience based on the recognition of
the other’s uniqueness. As a result, the testimonies analyzed reflect precisely this process, as
the students shifted from perceiving their conversation partners as homogeneous
representatives of a culture to recognizing them as individuals with unique experiences,
concerns, and life stories.
Such is the case of a Colombian participant, who stated: “My American classmate spoke about
his concerns regarding the cost of higher education. I thought Americans had everything figured
out, but when I heard him explain the financial difficulties he was facing, I realized that he, too,
faces complex situations. That conversation changed the way I think.” That being the case, this
account illustrates how direct contact fostered the development of empathy and helped
overcome oversimplified notions about the reality of the other.
Mechanisms Explaining the Effectiveness of Telecollaboration
Given the information presented, we can analyze some of the elements that appear to
contribute to the relative effectiveness of telecollaboration compared to traditional teaching
tactics in the control group. First, the interaction took place with real people, not with abstract
models of other cultures; this feature allowed for the creation of authentic relationships for
exchange and facilitated learning processes similar to those that occur within communities of
practice (Lave and Wenger, 1991), where knowledge is generated through social interaction,
while discussions within the context of telecollaboration activities continually challenged
participants’ prior ideas with concrete experiences.