Revista Multidisciplinaria Perspectivas Investigativas
Multidisciplinary Journal Investigative Perspectives
Vol. 4(1), 22-28, 2024
Felicidad laboral y praxis didáctica en docentes universitarios
Happiness at work and didactic praxis in university teachers
Weslyn Erasmo Valverde-Alva
25
The happiest workers are also the most productive. Happiness at work is associated with better
teacher performance, understood as the improvement of their pedagogical practices (Resdasari,
et al., 2022). On the other hand, (Aloe, et al., 2014), explain that teachers who manifest work
happiness are those who have the freedom to choose pedagogical methods, plan their curriculum
and make decisions related to their teaching, which translates into greater satisfaction and
commitment to their work. This aspect is developed in didactic praxis, influencing the teacher's
ability to promote meaningful learning and, therefore, explaining efficient performance.
When work happiness is analyzed from the affective perspective, an increase in teachers' work
performance is observed. Likewise, (Marina, et al., 2015), explain that educators who experience
positive emotions, such as joy and satisfaction, tend to show a more positive attitude towards
teaching, which can have an impact on the classroom climate and the relationship with students.
In addition, emotionally healthy teachers have a greater capacity to manage stress and
challenges in the school environment, contributing to greater resilience and job satisfaction,
favorable dimensions to favor didactic praxis.
In addition, didactic praxis in the university setting, as a cornerstone, stands as an active and
reflective amalgam between educational theory and practice. When addressing a doctoral
scientific audience, the imperative need to inquire into how university teachers implement their
pedagogical knowledge in teaching and how this implementation affects the students' learning
process becomes undeniable. In this presentation, it is subjected to closer scrutiny: In the
university context, didactic praxis implies the effective implementation of pedagogical theories in
practical teaching situations. It is not limited to the mere transmission of information; rather, it
focuses on the design and implementation of learning strategies that go beyond the conventional,
fostering the active participation of students.
University didactic praxis transcends the mechanical application of teaching methods. It
represents a conscious adaptation to the specific characteristics of the students, the contents and
the academic environment. The diversity of learning styles, levels of prior knowledge and cultural
contexts present in the classroom demands meticulous consideration on the part of university
teachers. At present, university didactic praxis is enriched by the thoughtful integration of
educational technology. Teachers must employ digital tools strategically, not only to enhance the
learning experience, but also to foster collaboration and equip students for today's work
environment.
Assessment, as an integral component of didactic praxis, demands formative strategies that
provide continuous feedback to improve the learning process. In addition, summative assessment
must be not only fair and valid, but also perfectly aligned with the learning objectives. Therefore,
didactic praxis implies a perpetual reflective process. University teachers must critically evaluate
themselves, identify areas for improvement, and adjust their approach in line with changing
student needs and advances in educational research.
Emphasizing the importance of research from didactic praxis is essential. The generation of
pedagogical knowledge through research contributes not only to the development of better
educational practices, but also to the training of more effective teachers. In this sense, didactic
praxis implies a constant commitment to professional development. The active pursuit of training
opportunities, vigorous participation in communities of practice, and maintaining a constant
update on trends and developments in higher education are imperative. In this comprehensive
consideration, a deeper understanding of how university faculty can effectively amalgamate
theory and practice, ultimately elevating the quality of higher education, is offered.
From the foregoing; the intrinsic relationship between occupational happiness and didactic praxis
in the university educational setting is exposed; it is a fascinating field of study that reveals
profound connections between teacher well-being and teaching quality. In this complex web of
variables, a web unfolds in which happiness at work emerges as an essential catalyst that directly
influences the effectiveness of didactic praxis.
Happiness at work, understood as the satisfaction and sense of fulfillment that a teacher
experiences in his or her daily work, becomes the sap that nourishes didactic praxis. When an
educator finds joy in his or her work, this positive emotional state translates into a deeper
commitment to the teaching process. The satisfaction derived from authentic relationships with