Peer evaluation instrument

Item

Score

Comments

1

2

3

1.    Title of the research  

2.    Abstract (composition, coherence, follow requirement of journal)

3.    Keywords according requirement of journal

4.    Relevance of topic

5.    Introduction (argued with strictly scientific rigor)

6.    Research objective

7.    Writing composition  

8.    Method applied (methodological rigor)

9.    Population

10. Measuring instrument  

11. Statistical data analysis

12. Quality and scientific rigor of results presented

13. Argumentative ability on discussion of research outcomes

14. Researcher contrasts with theories and other authors and highlights research findings.  

15. Argumentative ability on conclusion.

16. Research provides new insights of subject matter  

17. Researcher follows rules of editorial standards about bibliographic references.

Total

Item

Score

Comments

1

2

3

1.    Title of the research 

2.    Abstract (composition, coherence, follow requirement of journal)

3.    Keywords according requirement of journal

4.    Relevance of topic

5.    Introduction (argued with strictly scientific rigor)

6.    Research objective

7.    Writing composition  

8.    Method applied (methodological rigor)

9.    Population

10. Measuring instrument  

11. Statistical data analysis

12. Quality and scientific rigor of results presented

13. Argumentative ability on discussion of research outcomes

14. Researcher contrasts with theories and other authors and highlights research findings. 

15. Argumentative ability on conclusion.

16. Research provides new insights of subject matter  

17. Researcher follows rules of editorial standards about bibliographic references.

Total

Items

Score

Comments

1

2

3

1.    Title of the research 

2.    Abstract (composition, coherence, follow requirement of journal)

3.    Keywords according requirement of journal

4.    Relevance of topic

5.    Introduction (argued with strictly scientific rigor)

6.    Research objective

7.    Writing composition  

8.    Argumentative ability on discussion of research outcomes

9.    Researcher contrasts with theories and other authors and highlights research findings

10. Argumentative ability on conclusion.

11. Research provides new insights of subject matter  

12. Researcher follows rules of editorial standards about bibliographic references.

Total

Items

Score

Comments

1

2

3

1.    Title of the research 

2.    Abstract (composition, coherence, follow requirement of journal)

3.    Keywords according requirement of journal

4.    Relevance of topic

5.    Introduction (argued with strictly scientific rigor)

6.    Research objective

7.    Writing composition  

8.    Argumentative ability on discussion of research outcomes

9.    Researcher contrasts with theories and other authors and highlights research findings

10. Argumentative ability on conclusion.

11. Research provides new insights of subject matter  

12. Researcher follows rules of editorial standards about bibliographic references.

Total